• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?

• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?