Kõik teated
Saint Petersburg teatab veast
#47769: "no need to be sorted when cards flip."
inforequest: Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni
Mille kohta see veateade on?
Mis juhtus? Palun vali alt
Soovitus: minu arvates parandaks järgnev oluliselt mängu rakendamist
Detailne kirjeldus
• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.
when cards appear, cards are sorted.
but, I want to know who caused to flip 18 aristocrat on aristocrat phase.
I suggest not to be sorted when cards flip.• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v92
Aruande ajalugu
sept 4 th 2021 12:06 • Faceman255 • Arendajad ei ole seda soovitust veel analüüsinud:
It makes the game more interesting.
sept 4 th 2021 18:38 • Inaofr • Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni:
So you want drawn cards to be placed on the board in the order they were drawn?
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
sept 14 th 2021 15:29 • debjwillis • Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni:
I agree. I often wonder what the order is of the cards that come up in the next phase so I can better determine the effects of previous actions. Perhaps there's a way to first show the order that the cards came up in when beginning the new phase, and then provide a button where the player could autosort the cards by value when they are ready to do so?
sept 27 th 2021 10:13 • Faceman255 • Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni:
Yes, I think cards should be placed on the board in the order they were drawn.
juuni 1 st 2022 4:07 • Faceman255 • Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni:
In this game, mistress on the 1st round is very important.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
juuni 1 st 2022 4:15 • Faceman255 • Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni:
the reason why take meaningless card to flip more UG cards, to flip UG arist.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
juuni 1 st 2022 4:34 • Faceman255 • Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni:
it is a problem that we can't know the information that we can know at the real game.
juuni 7 th 2024 13:57 • bananasplay • Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni:
As debjwillis writes, one benefit of knowing the order of cards drawn is to ascertain the effects of previous actions. If one, for example, purchases or reserves a card in a given phase, one more card is drawn in the next phase—/which/ card, however, remains a mystery in the current implementation because the cards are automatically sorted. But if the cards were instead shown in the order drawn, the "extra" card would be obvious.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
juuni 14 th 2024 18:43 • TaxMan5x • Arendajad sooviksid selle ettepaneku kohta rohkem informatsiooni:
It's an interesting suggestion, but it reminds me of "chasing the rabbit" in hold em poker. While it's interesting to see if your choice was the correct one, it won't (or shouldn't) change your mind about that prior choice. Beyond self-validation, it doesn't really add anything to the game or your strategy.
Lisa midagi sellele raportile
Palun lisage siia midagi, mis tundub asjakohane selle vea reprodutseerimiseks või teie soovituse mõistmiseks:
- Teine laua ID / käigu ID
- Kas F5 lahendas probleemi?
- Kas probleem esines mitmel korral? Igal korral?
- Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.
