• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?

• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?