#85415: "prevent conceding victory around the end of the game"
Mille kohta see veateade on?
Mis juhtus? Palun vali alt
Mis juhtus? Palun vali alt
Palun kontrolli, kas samal teemal on juba aruanne olemas
Kui jah, siis HÄÄLETAGE selle raporti poolt. Kõige rohkem hääli sisaldavatele aruannetele antakse PRIORITEET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailne kirjeldus
-
• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. -
• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast kuvatõmmis (hea tava), saad kasutada nimetatud teenuseid (snipboard.io for example) pildi üleslaadimiseks ja kopeerida viite siia. Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. -
• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. -
• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?
-
• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. -
• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast kuvatõmmis (hea tava), saad kasutada nimetatud teenuseid (snipboard.io for example) pildi üleslaadimiseks ja kopeerida viite siia.
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast kuvatõmmis (hea tava), saad kasutada nimetatud teenuseid (snipboard.io for example) pildi üleslaadimiseks ja kopeerida viite siia. Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
-
• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Mozilla v5
Aruande ajalugu
But not understandable on BGA where the computer calculates and there's no effort from the player besides waiting 10 seconds.
So do you mean for this suggestion to apply ONLY to real time games?
That would make it a better suggestion, but it's not in the text of the suggestion.
Lisa midagi sellele raportile
- Teine laua ID / käigu ID
- Kas F5 lahendas probleemi?
- Kas probleem esines mitmel korral? Igal korral?
- Kui sul on sellest veast kuvatõmmis (hea tava), saad kasutada nimetatud teenuseid (snipboard.io for example) pildi üleslaadimiseks ja kopeerida viite siia.
