• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?

• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?