• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?

• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?