• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus

435 or somewhere near

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

435 or somewhere near

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?

435 or somewhere near

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?

435 or somewhere near

• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?

435 or somewhere near

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

435 or somewhere near

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

I am not sure if this sitaution was according to rules: Germany attacked with panzer 1 on Budapest. Supporting units were Germany unit 9 Inf and Panzer 2. Panzer 2 has no supplies. Combat bonuses were as follows (during bad weather):
+2 German unit
+1 attacking panzer
+1 supporting inf
+2 supporting panzer
+1 air support
-1 bad weather
-1 difficult terain
/2 no supplies

is this correct? for me the /2 is totally devastating and surprising :-)
according to Fikla there was no warning in the info box before rolling the dices

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?