Kõik teated
Lost Cities teatab veast
#3694: "Score was completely incorrect"
Mille kohta see veateade on?
Mis juhtus? Palun vali alt
Viga kuvamisel: osa kuvatud teabest oli vale (mõjutamata oluliselt mängu käiku)
Detailne kirjeldus
• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.
I had 0 points at end of the game. Should have had much more• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Safari v8
Aruande ajalugu
sept 29 th 2015 3:27 • B1onicArm • Viga ei ole veel arendajate poolt taasloodud:
Score was incorrect
okt 1 st 2015 13:07 • impeira • Viga ei ole veel arendajate poolt taasloodud:
I had a similar problem too.
The end score in my game ( de.boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=16502868 ) should be 38:32 but it is 38:52. imgur.com/J6e2b5a
The end score in my game ( de.boardgamearena.com/#!table?table=16502868 ) should be 38:32 but it is 38:52. imgur.com/J6e2b5a
nov 15 th 2015 21:33 • Alizae • Viga ei ole veel arendajate poolt taasloodud:
Player was also able to play 2 cards to start
end score was different than indicated.
imgur.com/Y6wKFJ7
end score was different than indicated.
imgur.com/Y6wKFJ7
jaan 18 th 2016 5:19 • Deuce Heart • Viga ei ole veel arendajate poolt taasloodud:
I saw my opponent appear to place two contracts on the first play of the game (he had placed one). At the end of the game, the scores on the player displays said 41-3 me, but the window with the final score showed 43-41 him (which was correct).
sept 16 th 2016 23:11 • Janabis • Viga ei ole veel arendajate poolt taasloodud:
A plusieurs reprises, dont ma dernière partie (Les Cités Perdues #23991835), les cartes de mon adversaires sont doublées. On se retrouve parfois avec quatre contrats ou avec deux 2 bleus, etc ...
(Sans compter les erreurs comptables. Mon adversaire est annoncé à -3 points & fini par me battre alors que j'en ai 34.)
(Sans compter les erreurs comptables. Mon adversaire est annoncé à -3 points & fini par me battre alors que j'en ai 34.)
märts 26 th 2020 23:56 • swoots • Viga ei ole veel arendajate poolt taasloodud:
I don't understand why starting a new expedition costs 40 points while in the actual game rules (as stated in the physical version I have and in the rules on this site) state that an expedition should cost 20 points.
märts 27 th 2020 0:01 • bmcfluff • Viga ei ole veel arendajate poolt taasloodud:
@swoots As shown in the rules, an expedition with a single handshake card and nothing else is worth -40 because it's -20 for starting the expedition which is then doubled by the handshake. So if you start with a handshake, your score is temporarily -40, whereas if you start with a number card, your score is temporarily -20 plus that number. This is consistent with the rules, both as written and as shown in the scoring example. If you have a specific game and move# where you think something was scored incorrectly, please let me know; otherwise there's nothing I can do.
apr 11 th 2020 9:32 • bmcfluff • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
This issue has 9 votes, but it seems to likely consist in large part of people misunderstanding the rules, and also the last comment that seems to be an actual bug is from 2016 so the bug might well have been fixed since then. Thus I am marking this as Info Needed and will take no further action unless someone provides more information suggesting there is a real, current bug - and please make sure you know how scoring with contract cards works first!
apr 11 th 2020 9:35 • bmcfluff • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
And if your bug involves a card appearing to be incorrectly *duplicated*, please check this other bug thread instead and post your table and move numbers there if relevant: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=3741
aug 27 th 2020 8:50 • DirkAxe • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
If you look at the screen shot of the end of the game and add up the points, I win. But according to the score keepers, I lost
aug 27 th 2020 16:01 • bmcfluff • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
@DirkAxe Did you post a screenshot? I don't see a link, and can't do much without one.
apr 23 rd 2021 23:53 • ZANGDARleGRAND • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
Bonjour, j'ai subi un bug de calcul de score.
Mon adversaire avait 14pts, a posé un 10 avec un seul contrat, et il a gagné 40pts au lieu de 20, le faisant gagner la partie.
photos.app.goo.gl/aAMRY4TosuZRUNxS7
Pouvez-vous le corriger ? Merci beaucoup
Mon adversaire avait 14pts, a posé un 10 avec un seul contrat, et il a gagné 40pts au lieu de 20, le faisant gagner la partie.
photos.app.goo.gl/aAMRY4TosuZRUNxS7
Pouvez-vous le corriger ? Merci beaucoup
apr 24 th 2021 1:15 • bmcfluff • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
Hi ZANGDARleGRAND,
That is not a bug; the rules say you get a 20 point bonus when you play your 8th card of the same color. (An extra entry appeared in the game log to explain that this is what was happening, but it looks like you didn't notice that.)
That is not a bug; the rules say you get a 20 point bonus when you play your 8th card of the same color. (An extra entry appeared in the game log to explain that this is what was happening, but it looks like you didn't notice that.)
apr 24 th 2021 1:24 • bmcfluff • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
READ ME BEFORE POSTING: This issue has 16 votes, but it seems to consist primarily of people misunderstanding the scoring rules, so go re-read those before posting here! In particular, make sure you know how to score 1) empty piles 2) piles with contract cards (with or without other cards), and 3) piles with 8+ cards (with or without contracts)
The last comment that looks like an actual bug is from 2016, so I'm not going to look into this further until someone has good evidence that a bug still exists.
The last comment that looks like an actual bug is from 2016, so I'm not going to look into this further until someone has good evidence that a bug still exists.
apr 5 th 2023 5:59 • chaybe • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
According to the physical game. Any time you start an expedition (playing anything on any one of the 5 colored areas) you lose 20 points. It's not doubled. It's a standard flat rate to go on the "expedition".
Your score can then either be doubled, tripled or quadrupled depending on how many handshakes you play before the numbered cards. As stated in the instructions, which might avoid confusion, points for use of each expedition should be subtracted after each round. (max 20 per column) Seperate from points gained.
The game is not accurate this way, playing multiple handshakes becomes pointless. A tad frustrating.
Your score can then either be doubled, tripled or quadrupled depending on how many handshakes you play before the numbered cards. As stated in the instructions, which might avoid confusion, points for use of each expedition should be subtracted after each round. (max 20 per column) Seperate from points gained.
The game is not accurate this way, playing multiple handshakes becomes pointless. A tad frustrating.
apr 8 th 2023 2:26 • bmcfluff • Selle vea taasloomiseks on arendajatel vaja rohkem teavet:
@chaybe: I am quite certain the scoring implementation here is correct: (-20)*2=(-40) appears as one of the examples on the back of the physical rulebook. Playing multiple handshakes using these (correct) rules is *not* pointless, since each handshake increases the potential loss but also the potential gain.
Lisa midagi sellele raportile
Palun lisage siia midagi, mis tundub asjakohane selle vea reprodutseerimiseks või teie soovituse mõistmiseks:
- Teine laua ID / käigu ID
- Kas F5 lahendas probleemi?
- Kas probleem esines mitmel korral? Igal korral?
- Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.
