• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?

It's not possible to attack without using the extra steps

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?