#133510: "The opponent intentionally did not counted a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed."
Mille kohta see veateade on?
Mis juhtus? Palun vali alt
Mis juhtus? Palun vali alt
Palun kontrolli, kas samal teemal on juba aruanne olemas
Kui jah, siis HÄÄLETAGE selle raporti poolt. Kõige rohkem hääli sisaldavatele aruannetele antakse PRIORITEET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailne kirjeldus
-
• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
-
• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?
Google Chrome v127
Aruande ajalugu
Because of my first experience with this, I managed to save my game in this way:
My opponent & I passed. My opponent refused to mark the dead stones. When the question came, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", I naturally answered, "yes". I kept playing and killed enough groups to make the game clearly won, and when we both passed, there was no re-counting of dead stones.
Sure enough, my opponent had selected "no", as I suspected he would.
This clearly promotes cheating. The proposed solutions are as follows, going from best to worst:
1) An algorithm that automatically designates dead stones.
2) NO QUESTION about having another stage for designating stones. Since there was already one stage, but the players COULDN'T AGREE, that means that there AUTOMATICALLY needs to be another round of dead stone designation. This should just happen every time.
3) If the question remains like it does now, it should be that if EITHER or BOTH of the players answers "yes", then there should be a stone counting stage.
Lisa midagi sellele raportile
- Teine laua ID / käigu ID
- Kas F5 lahendas probleemi?
- Kas probleem esines mitmel korral? Igal korral?
- Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.
