• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?

• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?