• Kui näed ekraanil veateadet, kopeeri see siia.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kirjelda, mida sa soovisid teha, mida sa tegid ja mis juhtus

114

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

114

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Mis oli ekraanil, kui sind blokeeriti? (Tühi ekraan? Osa mänguliidesest? Veateade?)

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millist osa BGA kohandamisest ei järgitud

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kas reeglite rikkumist on mängu taasesitusel näha? Kui jah, siis mitmendal käigul?

114

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Milline oli mängu tegevus, mida tahtsid sooritada?

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mida püüdsid teha, et seda mängu tegevust käivitada?

114

• Mis juhtus, kui seda proovisite (veateade, mängu olekuriba teade, ...)?

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Millises mängu etapis esines probleem (Mis oli selle mänguetapi instruktsioon)?

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mis juhtus, kui proovisite sooritada seda mängu käiku (veateade, mängu olekuriba sõnum, ...)?

114

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Kirjelda kuvamise probleemi. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun kopeeri/kleebi kuvatud tekst inglise keeles, mitte sinu oma keeles. Kui sul on sellest veast ekraanipilt (hea tava), saad kasutada Imgur.com selle üleslaadimiseks ja lingi siia kopeerida.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kas see tekst on kättesaadav tõlkesüsteemis ? Kui jah, kas see on tõlgitud rohkem kui 24 tundi tagasi?

114

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?

• Palun selgita oma ettepanekut täpselt ja lühidalt, et oleks võimalikult lihtne mõista, mida silmas pead.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• mis on sinu veebilehitseja?